APE conference 2014
On Tuesday 28th and Wednesday 29th of January the annual conference for Academic publishers Europe was held in Berlin. The title of the conference: redefining the Scientific Record.
Dutch politics set on “golden road” to Open Access
During the fist day the focus was on Open Access, starting with a presentation of the Dutch State Secretary for Education, Culture and Science on Open Access. In his presentation called “going for Gold” Sander Dekker outlined his policy with regards to the practice of providing open access to research publications and how that practice will continue to evolve. Open access is “a moral obligation” according to Sander Dekker. Access to scientific knowledge is for everyone. It promotes knowledge sharing and knowledge circulation and is essential for further development of society.
Open access means having electronic access to research publications, articles and books (free of charge). This is an international issue. Every year, approximately two million articles appear in 25,000 journals that are published worldwide. The Netherlands accounts for some 33,000 articles annually. Having unrestricted access to research results can help disseminate knowledge, move science forward, promote innovation and solve the problems that society faces.
The first steps towards open access were taken twenty years ago, when researchers began sharing their publications with one another on the Internet. In the past ten years, various parties in the Netherlands have been working towards creating an open access system. A wide variety of rules, agreements and options for open access publishing have emerged in the research community. The situation is confusing for authors, readers and publishers alike, and the stakeholders would like this confusion to be resolved as quickly as possible.
The Dutch Government will provide direction so that the parties know what to expect and can make arrangements with one another. It will promote the “golden” open access; publication in journals that make research articles available online free of charge. The State Secretaries aim is to have switched entirely to the golden road to open access within ten years, in other words by 2024. In order to achieve this, at least 60 per cent of all articles will have to be available in open access journals in five years’ time. A true switch will only be possible if we cooperate and coordinate with other countries.
Further reading: http://www.government.nl/issues/science/documents-and-publications/parliamentary-documents/2014/01/21/open-access-to-publications.html or http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ministeries/ocw/nieuws/2013/11/15/over-10-jaar-moeten-alle-wetenschappelijke-publicaties-gratis-online-beschikbaar-zijn.html
Do researchers even want Open Access?
The two other keynote speakers, David Black and Wolfram Koch presented their concerns on the transition from the current publishing model to open access. Researchers are using more frequently subject repositories for sharing their knowledge. There is an urgent need for organization and standards in this field. But who takes the lead? Furthermore, we must not forget the systems for quality assurance and peer review. These are under pressure as a huge amount of articles are being published and peer review tends to take place more and more after publication. Open access should lower the barriers for access to research for the users, but what about the barriers for scholars publishing on their research? Koch stated that the traditional model worked fine for scientists. They don’t want to change. However, there do not seem to be any figures to support this assertion.
Interesting to notice was that in almost all presentation on the first day of APE digital preservation was mentioned, one way or the other. The vocabulary was different, but it is acknowledged as an important topic. Accessibility of scientific publications for long-term is a necessity, regardless of the publishing model.
KB and NCDD workshop on roles and responsibilities
The 2nd day of the conference the focus was on innovation (the future of the article, dotcoms) and on preservation!
The national library of The Netherlands (KB) and the Dutch Coalition for Digital Preservation (NCDD) organized a session on the topic of the preservation of scientific output: “roles and responsibilities in guaranteeing permanent access to the scholarly record”. The session was chaired by Marcel Ras, program manager for the NCDD.
The trend towards e-only access for scholarly information is continuing at a rapid rate, and a growing number of data are ‘born digital’ and have no print counterpart. As for scholarly publications half of all serial publications will be online only by 2016. For researchers and students there is a huge benefit, they now have online access to journal articles to read and download, anywhere, any time. And they are making use of it to an increasing extend. However, the downside is that there is an increasing dependency on access to digital information. Without permanent access to information scholarly activities are no longer possible. For libraries there are many benefits associated with publishing and accessing academic journals online. E-only access has the potential to save the academic sector a considerable amount of money. Library staff resources required to process printed materials can be reduces significantly. Libraries also potentially save money in terms of the management, storage and end user access of print journals. While suppliers are willing to provide discounts for e-only access.
Publishers may not share post-cancellation and preservation concerns
However, there are concerns that what is now in digital form may not always be available due to rapid technological developments or developments within the publishing industry; this and how to ensure post-cancellation access to paid-for content are key barriers to institutions making the move to e-only. There is a danger that e-journals become “ephemeral” unless we take active steps to preserve the bits and bytes that increasingly represent our collective knowledge. We are all familiar with examples of hardware becoming obsolete; 8 inch and 5.25 inch floppy discs, Betamax video tapes, and probably soon cd-roms. Also software is not immune to obsolescence.
On top of this threat of technical obsolescence there is the change in the role of libraries. Libraries have in the past assumed preservation responsibility for material they collect, while publishers have supplied the material libraries need. These well understood divisions of labour does not work in a digital environment and especially so when dealing with e-journals. Libraries buy licenses to enable their users to gain network access to a publisher’s server. The only original copy of an issue of an e-journal is not on the shelves of a library, but tends to be held by the publisher. But the long term preservation of that copy is of importance to the library and research communities rather than to the publisher.
Can third-party solutions ensure safe custody?
So we may need new models and sometimes organizations to ensure safe custody of these objects for future generations. A number of initiatives have emerged in an effort to address these concerns. Research and developments in digital preservation issues has grown mature. Tools and services are being developed to help planning and perform digital preservation activities. Furthermore third-party organizations and archiving solutions are established to help the academic community to preserve publications and to advance research in sustainable ways. These trusted parties can be addressed by users when strict conditions (trigger events or post cancellation) are met. In addition, publishers are adapting to changing library requirements, participating in the different archiving schemes and increasingly providing options for post cancellation access.
In this session the problem was presented from the different viewpoints and the different stakeholders in this game. Focussing on the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders.
Neil Beagrie explained the problem in depth; technical, organisational and financial. He highlighted the distinction between perpetual access and digital preservation. In the case of perpetual access, organisations have a license or subscription for an e-journal and either the publisher discontinues the journal or the organisation stops its subscription. Keeping e-journals available in this case is called “post-cancellation” . This situation differs from long term preservation, where the e-journal in general is preserved for users whether they ever subscribed or not. Several initiatives for the latter situation were mentioned as well as the benefits these organisations like LOCKSS, CLOCKSS, Portico and the e-Depot of the KB brings to publishers. More details about his vision can be read in the DPC Tech Watch report Preservation, Trust and Continuing Access to e-Journals . (Presentation: APE2014_Beagrie)
Susan Reilly of the Association of European Research Libraries (LIBER) sketched the changing role of research libraries. It is essential that the scholarly record is preserved, which encompasses e-journal articles, research data, e-books, digitized cultural heritage and dynamic web content. Libraries are a major player in this field and can be seen as an intermediary between publishers and researchers. (Presentation: APE2014_Reilly)
Eefke Smit of the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM) explained to the audience why digital preservation was especially important in the playing field of STM publishers. Publishers are keen to contribute to digital preservation and from their very start have given substantial support to initiatives like Portico, Clockss and the KB e-depot. STM is among the founding members of the Alliance of Permanent Access (APA) and an active partner in various EU-projects on digital preservation. They have also put in place best practice examples for preservation arrangements and post-cancellation policies. Many preservation services are being made available and are being developed but more collaboration between all stakeholders of the scholarly communication chain is needed, from research communities, to libraries, to publishers and archives. The APARSEN project is an important step in this,focusing on some aspects like trust, persistent identifiers and cost models, but there are still a wide range of challenges to be solved as the traditional publication models will continually change, from text and documents to “multi-versioned, multi-sourced and multi-media”. (Presentation: APE2014_Smit)
As Peter Burnhill from EDINA, University of Edinburgh explained, the continued access to the scholarly record is under threat as libraries are no longer the custodians of the scholarly record in e-journals. As he phrased it nicely: libraries have no longer e-collections but only e-connections. His KEEPERS registry is a global registry of e-journal archiving and offers an overview of who is preserving what. Organisations like LOCKSS, CLOCKSS, the e-Depot, the Chinese National Science Library and since recently the Library of Congress send in their holding information to this KEEPERS Registry. However nice, it was also emphasized that this is only a small part of the existing e-journals (currently about 19% of the e-journals with an ISSN assigned). More support for the preserving libraries and collaboration with publishers is needed to preserve the e-journals of smaller publishers to improve the coverage. (Presentation: APE2014_Burnhill)
(By Marcel Ras and Barbara Sierman)
Categorised in: Uncategorized